How Tech Taxes Became the World’s Hottest Economic Debate

U.S. Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin participates in a dinner with global business leaders during the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, January 21, 2020.

New York Times

A growing movement by foreign governments to tax American tech giants that supply internet search, online shopping and social media to their citizens has quickly emerged as the largest global economic battle of 2020.

The fight pits traditional allies against each other, with European countries like France, Italy and Britain clashing with the U.S. over their plans to impose new taxes on digital services provided by companies like Amazon and Google.

At the core of the debate are fundamental questions about where economic activity in the digital age is generated, where it should be taxed and who should collect that revenue. The potential for large tax dollars has spurred governments across the world to consider new digital taxes and has even inspired lawmakers in some American states, like Maryland and New York, to propose their own levies on digital trade.

Last week, national leaders meeting in Davos, Switzerland, brokered a truce between the U.S. and France, which had planned to move ahead with a digital services tax. Officials in both countries said they would pause what had been an escalating dispute in order to give international negotiators a chance to reach a global tax agreement that could halt a proliferation of digital taxes.

But the meetings, which took place at the World Economic Forum, have also brought new threats of taxation and tariff retaliation and underscored how fragile negotiations remain.
The stakes are high for governments and multinational corporations – even those outside the tech sector. The digital tax negotiations, which are being conducted through the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, have become entwined with efforts to reduce attempts by companies to avoid taxes by shifting profits overseas.

Late last year, negotiators at the OECD, including a delegation from the Trump administration, agreed to a first-step framework that would allow countries to tax certain digital-service providers even if they did not have physical presences inside their borders.
But U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin quickly surprised OECD officials with a letter requesting a change to the framework, one that would effectively allow some U.S. companies to opt out of those taxes. OECD officials pushed back, and negotiators are set to meet again this week in Paris.

The discussions, which are expected to last months, could end with an agreement on a global minimum tax that all multinational companies must pay on their profits, regardless of where the profits are booked. The negotiations could also set a worldwide standard for how much tax companies must remit to certain countries based on their digital activity.
Mnuchin expressed frustration in Davos that a digital sales tax had become such a focus of discussion at the World Economic Forum. Setting a minimum tax for companies around the world, to prevent them from hiding profits in tax havens, will make a much bigger difference, he said.

“From my perspective, that is by far the more important,” he said.

There is a chance the talks could devolve into a “Wild West” array of separate tax regimes on digital activity around the world.

“It’s a big old mess,” said Jennifer McCloskey, vice president for policy at the Information Technology Industry Council, a trade group that represents companies including Apple, Oracle and several other American tech leaders. “But,” she added, “that’s to be expected.”
Companies that operate across borders have long paid taxes where their profits are booked. Calculating that sounds simple enough, but it has grown increasingly complicated in recent decades. To reduce their tax bills, corporations have shifted profits – and in some cases their headquarters – on paper to low-tax countries like Bermuda and Ireland. OECD countries like the U.S. have agreed to measures meant to discourage such shifting.

Such efforts did not resolve some countries’ complaints about Facebook, eBay and other companies that offer online services to their residents but have little or no physical presence within their borders. Those governments, along with leaders of the European Union, say large tech companies are avoiding paying their fair share of taxes.

“They’re looking for new ways to raise revenue,” said Nicole Kaeding, an economist and vice president of policy promotion at the National Taxpayers Union Foundation, which opposes the digital tax push by countries and states. “These are all wrapped up in the questions of how do we adjust a tax system that is a hundred years old in order to tax the digital economy?”

The feud between French and U.S. officials has sped up the OECD process to rewrite those rules, which has a deadline for completion at the end of this year.

France announced plans last year to impose a 3 percent tax starting January 1 on the revenues that companies earn from providing digital services to French users. The government estimated a windfall of 500 million euros (about $563 million). Similar taxes are under consideration in Britain, Italy, Canada and a host of other wealthy nations.

Those moves have drawn criticism, and tariff threats, from the Trump administration. President Donald Trump has insisted that only the U.S. may tax American-based companies – even though American multinationals already pay taxes in other countries where they have factories or other physical operations. The president threatened to retaliate against France with U.S. tariffs of up to 100 percent on French wine, cheese, handbags and other goods.

Last week, Mnuchin also threatened tariffs against Italy and Britain if they impose similar taxes. British Chancellor Sajid Javid, who is also in Davos, said Britain would push ahead with the tax regardless.

Some observers are skeptical that the process can produce consensus – from some 130 countries – by year’s end.

“Some countries are going to have to give up taxing rights in order to allow other countries to have them. And the question is: Who?” said J. Clark Armitage, a former IRS official and the president of the tax firm Caplin & Drysdale in Washington. “It’s going to be hard to pass something that tracks what they propose.”

Negotiators face intense and competing pressures from large multinational companies. American tech firms are eager for a deal that would prevent multiple countries from imposing a wide variety of taxes on their activities.

“The worst case would be triple, quadruple taxation, because of how the individual taxes are not aligned,” said Jordan Haas, trade director for the Internet Association, another tech trade group in Washington.

Myanmar Summary

အင်တာနက်ရှာဖွေရေး၊ အွန်လိုင်းဈေးဝယ်/ရောင်းဝန်‌ဆောင်မှု၊ လူမှုမီဒီယာ တန်ဆောင်မှုပေးနေသည့် အမေရိကန် ကုမ္ပဏီများကို အခွန်ကောက်ခံမည် နိုင်ငံခြား အစိုးရအရေအတွက် များပြားလာခြင်းသည် ၂၀၂၀ ခုနှစ်၏ ကမ္ဘာ့စီးပွားရေး စစ်‌ပွဲတစ်ခုဖြစ်‌လာသည်။

ထိုကဲ့သို့ အပြန်အလှန် တွန်းတိုက်မှုများသည် အစဥ်အလာအရ မဟာမိတ်များအကြားတွင်ပင် ပြဿနာများပေါ်လာသည်။ ဥပမာအားဖြင့် ပြင်သစ်၊ အီတလီ၊ ဗြိတိန်တို့ကဲ့သို့သော ဥရောပနိုင်ငံများသည် Amazon နှင့် Google တို့က ပေးနေသည့် ဒီဂျစ်တယ်ဝန်ဆောင်မှုများအပေါ် အခွန်ကောက်ခံရန် အစီအစဥ်များ ပြုလုပ်နေသည့်ကိစ္စနှင့် ပတ်သက်၍ အမေရိကန်နှင့် ပြဿနာကြုံနေရသည်။

အဆိုပါ အငြင်းအခုံများတွင် အဓိက အချက်မှာ ဒီဂျစ်တယ်ခေတ်တွင် စီးပွားရေး လုပ်ငန်းများကို မည်သည့်နေရာတွင် လုပ်ကိုင်သလဲ၊ အဆိုပါ လုပ်ငန်းများကို မည်သည့်နေရာတွင် အခွန်ကောက်သင့်သလဲ၊ မည်သူက အခွန်ကောက်သင့်သလဲဆိုသည့် မေးခွန်းများဖြစ်သည်။ အခွန်ဒေါ်လာငွေပမာဏ အများအပြားရရှိ နိုင်သည့် အလားလာများကြောင့် ဒီဂျစ်တယ်အခွန်ကောက်ရန် ကမ္ဘာတစ်ဝှမ်းရှိ အစိုးရများကို စဥ်းစားလာစေသည်။

ပြီးခဲ့သည့် သီတင်းပတ်က အမေရိကန်နှင့် ပြင်သစ်တို့အကြား သဘောတူညီမှု တစ်ခုရခဲ့သည်။ ပြင်သစ်နိုင်ငံအနေဖြင့် ဒီဂျစ်တယ်ဝန်ဆောင်မှုအပေါ် အခွန်ကောက်ခံမည့် ကိစ္စကို ဆက်လက်ဆောင်ရွက်ရန် စီစဥ်ထားသည်။ နှစ်နိုင်ငံတာဝန်ရှိသူများကတော့ နိုင်ငံတကာမှ ညှိနှိုင်းဆောင်ရွက်သူများအနေဖြင့် ကမ္ဘာလုံးဆိုင်ရာ အခွန်သဘောတူညိချက်ရရှိရေးဆောင်ရွက်နိုင်အောင် အခွင့်အရေးပေးသည့်အနေဖြင့် အငြင်းပွားမှုကို ‌ခေတ္တရပ်ဆိုင်ထားမည်ဖြစ်ကြောင်း ပြောသည်။

SOURCEJim Tankersley (Reuters)
Previous articleFintech Challenge Aims to Drive Financial Inclusion
Next articleInside Prada’s Pop-Up Private Club